World4Solar – KNOWLEDGE BASE

Roof-Mounted Solar vs. Freestanding PV System: Which One is Better?

Introduction to Solar Power Options

The Rise of Solar Energy

Over the past decade, solar energy has shifted from being seen primarily as an eco-friendly alternative to a viable mainstream solution for energy. Advancements in solar technology have led to significant reductions in costs and improvements in efficiency, making solar power accessible to a broader audience. As of 2021, solar power contributes to a considerable portion of global renewable energy production, with millions of residential and commercial installations worldwide. This growth is fueled by a combination of environmental awareness, increasing cost of traditional energy, and substantial improvements in photovoltaic technology.

Deciding Between Roof Solar and Freestanding Solar Solutions

When it comes to choosing between roof-mounted solar panels and freestanding solar installations, several factors need to be considered. These include the efficiency of energy production, initial and long-term costs, spatial requirements, and the potential for scaling the systems in the future. This article explores both options in-depth, providing insights into their benefits and limitations, helping you make a well-informed decision based on your specific needs and circumstances.

 

Understanding Roof Solar Solutions

How Roof Solar Works

Roof-mounted solar panels, typically made from photovoltaic (PV) cells, capture sunlight and convert it into electricity. These panels are installed on the rooftops of residential or commercial buildings and are directly connected to the building’s electrical grid. The energy produced can either be used in real-time or fed back into the public grid, often with financial credits returned to the owner through net metering policies.

Benefits of Roof Solar

Roof-mounted solar systems offer several advantages. They make efficient use of otherwise unused roof space and do not require additional land, which can be particularly beneficial in urban settings. Furthermore, these systems can significantly increase a property’s value and appeal in the real estate market. According to a study by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, homes with solar panels sell faster and for a higher price than those without.

Challenges and Considerations of Roof Solar

The effectiveness of roof-mounted solar systems largely depends on the suitability of the roof which includes factors like orientation, pitch, shading, and the structural integrity to support the panels. Roofs with southern exposure in the Northern Hemisphere receive the most sunlight, thereby generating more energy. However, issues such as shading from nearby buildings or trees and the physical condition of the roof can significantly impact the system’s performance.

 

Exploring Freestanding Solar Solutions

The Basics of Freestanding PV systems

Freestanding solar installations, such as solar farms or solar carports, offer unparalleled versatility compared to roof-mounted systems. These installations are not restricted by the structural limitations of buildings, allowing them to be set up in diverse locations, including rural fields, parking lots, or unused ground areas. This freedom is particularly beneficial in less urbanized settings where space is plentiful and can be optimized without structural constraints. Additionally, freestanding solar can be scaled with relative ease to accommodate growing energy needs, making them an ideal choice for large-scale energy projects.

Benefits of Freestanding PV systems vs. Roof-mounted systems

Freestanding solar systems provide several compelling advantages over roof-mounted systems, making them an increasingly popular choice for many energy consumers:

  1. Optimal Orientation and Tilt: These systems can be oriented and angled for maximum sun exposure throughout the year, which significantly enhances their energy-generating efficiency.
  2. Ease of Access: Maintenance, cleaning, and system upgrades are simpler and less disruptive because these systems are more accessible than rooftop installations.
  3. Higher Efficiency and Output: Without the constraints of a building’s architecture, freestanding panels often achieve higher efficiency and generate more power, delivering better performance overall.
  4. Scalability: They can be expanded easily to increase capacity or upgraded with newer technology, providing long-term flexibility and utility.
  5. Lower Impact on Structures: Since they do not load any structures with additional weight, they eliminate the risk of structural damage that can sometimes occur with roof installations.
  6. Dual Use of Space: In setups like solar carports or agri-photovoltaics, the land below the panels can still be utilized for parking or agriculture, effectively using the same piece of land for dual purposes.

 

 Challenges and Considerations of Freestanding PV systems

Efficiency ratings are crucial in choosing solar panels as they dictate how much sunlight the panels can convert into usable energy. A higher efficiency rating means more energy is produced per square foot of panel, which is particularly important in areas with limited roof space. Efficient panels generate more electricity and provide greater savings in the long run, emphasizing the need to look beyond just the initial price when selecting solar panels.

While freestanding PV installations offer numerous advantages, they also come with their own set of challenges:

  1. Land Requirement: They require a significant amount of land, which may not be available or affordable in urban or suburban areas.
  2. Zoning and Permitting: These systems often face more complex zoning and permitting processes than roof-mounted systems, which can delay installation timelines. However, if you decide for a series-produced solution such as the World4Solar’s 7.38kW HelioWing 5 and 9.84kW HelioWing 7, these come with standardized permitting packages and only require site-specific permitting.
  3. Higher Initial Investment: The need for constructing supporting structures and potentially longer cable runs can increase the initial investment compared to roof-mounted systems. Luckily, with an all-in-one HelioWing system, this problem doesn’t really affect you as the supporting structure holds all electric components such as inverter or optional batteries and even the cables are hidden within the structure.
 

Despite these challenges, the long-term benefits and superior flexibility of freestanding solar make them a compelling option for those looking to maximize their solar energy production, particularly in settings where land availability and scalability are key considerations.

 

Comparative Analysis 

Cost Comparison of roof-mounted and freestanding PV systems

While roof-mounted systems initially save money due to the simpler integration into existing structures, with average installation costs ranging from $15,000 to $25,000, freestanding PV systems, though potentially starting from $20,000 to $30,000, often yield higher returns over time due to greater efficiencies. This higher initial cost reflects the need for additional structural components and more extensive site preparation. However, the real financial benefit of freestanding systems becomes apparent in their operational savings: due to optimal placement, these systems can generate up to 20% more energy than similarly rated roof-mounted systems in suboptimal positions. This increased output can significantly shorten the payback period — from a typical 10 to 12 years to potentially just 8 to 9 years, depending on energy costs and usage patterns. Over the lifespan of the systems, which can be up to 30 years or more, the additional energy production of freestanding systems can translate into tens of thousands of dollars in saved energy costs.

Efficiency and Performance of roof-mounted and freestanding PV systems

Freestanding solar installations generally achieve better performance metrics compared to roof-mounted systems. With the ability to be ideally oriented and tilted towards the sun, freestanding PV systems operate at peak efficiency for more hours per day. For example, while a roof-mounted system might capture 85% of the optimal solar radiation due to fixed angles and orientations, a freestanding PV system in an ideal setup can achieve closer to 100% efficiency. This difference can result in generating up to 10-20% more electricity throughout the year. In terms of energy output, a freestanding PV system like thWorld4Solar’s 7.38kW HelioWing 5 can produce an additional 3.000 kWh per year*, which is far more than a typical household consumes (at around 10,800 kWh annually), compared to a roof-mounted PV system, which can significantly offset household energy demands and reduce utility bills by selling excess energy back to the grid.

Suitability Based on Location

The decision between roof and freestanding solar systems is also influenced by location-specific factors. In urban areas, where the cost per square foot of land can exceed $100, utilizing existing roof space is a cost-effective solution. Conversely, in rural areas where land may cost as little as $1 to $10 per square foot, the opportunity to install larger, more optimally configured freestanding systems makes more economic sense. Moreover, these installations can be expanded easily, offering scalability that is not feasible with roof-mounted PV systems. This flexibility is particularly advantageous as energy needs grow or as users aim to increase their sustainability efforts by offsetting more of their energy use with solar power.

* at a total of 14,815kWh per year with 5.5 hours of sunlight per day

 

Quick Comparison of Roof-Mounted and Freestanding PV Systems

Conventional Roof-Mounted PV System

Freestanding PV System (Solar Carport or Canopy)

Makes use of more efficient bi-facial solar modules (up to +20%)

Provides maximum visibility as a physical statement for a sustainable lifestyle

Is independent of the architectural features and orientation of your home / real estate

Doesn‘t require alteration of the architectural features of your home / real estate

Can be installed in less than a day

Offers design options to suit your individual needs, style and taste

Comes with integrated features such as an EV charger or battery storage to foster a sustainable lifestyle

Provides shelter to your EV or other belongings and protects them from the elements

 

Environmental Impact

Carbon Footprint Analysis

Both types of solar installations significantly reduce the carbon footprint of energy consumption when compared to fossil fuels. By generating clean, renewable energy, both roof and freestanding solar systems help decrease greenhouse gas emissions and reduce reliance on non-renewable energy sources. The specific environmental impact varies based on the size and efficiency of the installation but is uniformly positive across both types of solar solutions.

Long-term Sustainability

Investing in solar power, regardless of the installation type, contributes significantly to long-term environmental sustainability. Not only does solar power reduce operational emissions, but it also encourages the development of green technology and industries. Freestanding PV system installations, in particular, have the potential to be expanded or upgraded more easily than roof-mounted systems, which can further enhance their sustainability over time as newer, more efficient technologies become available.

 

Case Studies

Case Study 1 – Freestanding PV system HelioWing 7

Product: 
State: 
Sunshine:
Vehicle:
HelioWing 7 (Base Model, grid connected) 
California (average household)
5.5 hours (average per day)
Tesla Model 3 (Standard Range Plus)
Product: 

HelioWing 7 (Base Model, grid connected) 

State: 

California
(average household)

Sunshine:

5.5 hours
(average per day)

Vehicle:

Tesla Model 3 (Standard Range Plus)
Scenario Setup Details
Estimated Energy Production HelioWing 7 per Year:
19,753 kWh (9.84 kWp @5.5h sunshine/day = 54.12 kWh per day)
Average Household Consumption per Year:
10,344 kWh (28.3 kWh per day) 
Electric Car Energy Capacity:
54 kWh (@230 miles range @0.24 kWh per mile)
Electric Car Energy Consumption per Year:
3,186kWh (@13,500 miles per year average)
Average Price per kWh to Buy:
$0.31
 Average Price per kWh to Sell:
$0.15 
 Predicted Energy Price Inflation:
5% p.a.
Estimated Energy Production HelioWing 7 per Year:
Average Household Consumption per Year:
Electric Car Energy Capacity:
 Electric Car Energy Consumption per Year:
 Average Price per kWh to Buy:
 Average Price per kWh to Sell:
 Predicted Energy Price Inflation:
19,753 kWh (9.84 kWp @5.5h sunshine/day = 54.12 kWh per day) 
10,344 kWh (28.3 kWh per day) 
54 kWh (@230 miles range @0.24 kWh per mile)
3,186kWh (@13,500 miles per year average)
$0.31 
$0.15 
5% p.a.

Timeframe

Cost Savings Through Used Energy

+ Excess Production Sold Back to the Grid

Over 5 years (Household Only)

$17,718 (@10,344 kWh per year)

+ $7,798 (@9,409 kWh per year)

Over 10 years (Household Only)

$40,334 (@10,344 kWh per year)

+ $17,751 (@9,409 kWh per year)

Over 20 years (Household Only)

$106,046 (@10,344 kWh per year)

+ $46,697 (@9,409 kWh per year)

Over 5 years (Household + EV)

$23,174 (@13,530 kWh per year)

+ $5,157 (@6,223 kWh per year)

Over 10 years (Household + EV)

$52,749 (@13,530 kWh per year)

+ $11,740 (@ 6,223 kWh per year)

Over 20 years (Household + EV)

$134,334 (@13,530 kWh per year)

+ $30,865 (@6,223 kWh per year)

 

Case Study 2 – Freestanding PV system HelioWing 5

Product: 
State: 
Sunshine:
Vehicle:
HelioWing 5 (Base Model, stand-alone) 
Texas (average household)
6 hours (average per day)
Tesla Model S (Long Range)
Product: 

HelioWing 5 (Base Model, stand-alone) 

State: 

Texas
(average household)

Sunshine:

6 hours
(average per day)

Vehicle:

Tesla Model S
(Long Range)
Scenario Setup Details
Estimated Energy Production HelioWing 5 per Year:
16,162 kWh (7.38 kWp @6h sunshine/day = 44.28 kWh per day)
Average Household Consumption per Year:
14,112 kWh (38.6 kWh per day)
Electric Car Energy Capacity:
100 kWh (@400 miles range @0.25 kWh per mile)
Electric Car Energy Consumption per Year:
3,375kWh (@13,500 miles per year average)
Average Price per kWh to Buy:
$0.12
Predicted Energy Price Inflation:
3% p.a.
Estimated Energy Production HelioWing 5 per Year:
Average Household Consumption per Year:
Electric Car Energy Capacity:
 Electric Car Energy Consumption per Year:
 Average Price per kWh to Buy:
 Predicted Energy Price Inflation:
16,162 kWh (7.38 kWp @6h sunshine/day = 44.28 kWh per day) 
14,112 kWh (38.6 kWh per day) 
100 kWh (@400 miles range @0.25 kWh per mile)
3,375kWh (@13,500 miles per year average)
$0.12 
3% p.a.

Timeframe

Cost Savings Through Used Energy

Over 5 years (Household Only)

$8,995 (@14,112 kWh per year)

Over 10 years (Household Only)

$19,443 (@14,112 kWh per year)

Over 20 years (Household Only)

$46,894 (@14,112 kWh per year)

Over 5 years (Household + EV)

$10,296 (@16,162 kWh per year, max performance)

Over 10 years (Household + EV)

$22,233 (@16,162 kWh per year, max performance)

Over 20 years (Household + EV)

$52,113 (@16,162 kWh per year, max performance)

If you are interested in your individual calculations for savings over the system’s lifetime of a HelioWing, contact us here:

 

Incentives and Rebates

Government and State Incentives

Governments worldwide, and particularly in the United States, offer a range of incentives for solar energy installations. These incentives can include tax credits, rebates, and grants designed to lower the barrier to entry for both residential and commercial solar energy projects. For example, the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) allows for a deduction of up to 30% of the total system cost from federal taxes.

Local Benefits and Supports

In addition to federal incentives, many local governments offer their own benefits for solar energy users, such as property tax exemptions, sales tax exemptions, and additional rebates. Utilities may also provide net metering programs that compensate solar energy producers for excess power sent back to the grid, enhancing the financial returns of solar investmentsOur full guide for financial incentives for going solar in the U.S. can be found here, sorted by state.

 

Installation and Maintenance

Ease of Installation

Roof-mounted solar systems generally require less time and fewer resources to install than freestanding systems. They leverage existing structures, minimizing the need for additional materials and labor. However, the complexity of installation can vary significantly with the condition and design of the roof. With a series-produced, out-of-the-box system like the HelioWing 5 (7.38kW)  or HelioWing 7 (9.84kW), installation time drops to just one day and therefore the costs are very likely to be lower than the installation costs for a roof-mounted PV system.

Long-term Maintenance Requirements

While both roof-mounted and freestanding solar systems require relatively minimal maintenance, freestanding installations are often easier to access for cleaning, repairs, and upgrades. This accessibility can reduce maintenance costs and downtime, potentially extending the lifespan and efficiency of the solar panels.

 

Making the Right Choice for Your Home or Business

Assessing Your Needs

Before deciding on a solar solution, it’s crucial to evaluate specific energy needs, property characteristics, and financial objectives. Factors such as property orientation, local climate conditions, and personal or business energy consumption should all be considered to choose the most suitable and effective solar installation.

Consulting with Professionals

Working with a professional solar consultant can help tailor the solar installation to your particular needs. These experts can provide valuable insights into the latest technologies, best practices in installation, and navigate local regulations and incentives, ensuring that you maximize your investment. You can contact us here.

 

Conclusion

The decision between roof-mounted and freestanding PV system installations involves a complex array of factors, including efficiency, cost, available space, and long-term goals. While roof solar offers a convenient and often less obtrusive option for many urban dwellers, freestanding solar provides greater flexibility and potential efficiency for those with sufficient land. Regardless of the choice, transitioning to solar power is a proactive step towards sustainability, energy independence, and long-term cost savings. As the technology evolves, the opportunities for implementing solar solutions will only broaden, making solar an increasingly attractive option for energy consumers worldwide.


FAQ’s

Key factors include the available space, roof suitability, budget, energy needs, and long-term scalability. For urban settings with limited space, roof solar might be more appropriate, while freestanding solar is ideal for those with ample land. Additionally, consider local climate conditions and potential shading on the property to decide which installation would perform more efficiently.

Savings can vary widely based on several factors such as the size of the installation, your local energy rates, and how much sunlight your area receives. On average, homeowners can reduce their electricity bills by 50% to 90%. For precise savings, consider having a solar consultant perform an energy audit to estimate potential savings for your specific circumstances.

Yes, some of the most promising upcoming technologies include transparent solar panels, which can double as windows, and solar skins, which integrate photovoltaic cells directly into building materials like roof shingles. Additionally, solar paint and solar fabric are under development, which could transform almost any surface into a solar energy generator.

 

Net metering programs allow solar panel owners to sell excess energy back to the electricity grid. This not only provides financial credits that can offset the cost of grid-supplied electricity at night or on cloudy days but also enhances the economic return of installing solar panels. The specifics can vary by region, so it’s recommended to check with your local utility company for details.

Solar panels typically come with a warranty of 25 to 30 years, but they can continue to function efficiently beyond that, often up to 40 years. The long lifespan of solar panels means that after the initial return on investment is realized (usually within 8 to 15 years), the savings on energy bills can be substantial over time. It’s important to also consider the minimal maintenance costs when calculating the overall return on investment.

More relevant posts for you

Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Discover more from World4Solar

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading